Itxa/620/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-9,Mum v. M/S Vaspar Fischer Ltd
High Court
22 Sep 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/620/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-9,Mum v. M/S Vaspar Fischer Ltd
Date of order
22 Sep 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itxa/620/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-9,Mum v. M/S Vaspar Fischer Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O.O.C.J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.620 OF 2008
-----------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office
Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s
appearances, Court’s orders
order or directions
-----------------------------------------------------
¦ Mr.J.S.Saluja for the Appellant.
¦ Mr.V.S.Hadade for the Respondent.
¦
¦
¦ CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH &
¦ J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
¦ DATED:22ND SEPTEMBER, 2008
P.C.:
Heard the learned Counsel for the
Appellant. There is a finding of
fact recorded by the tribunal that
the amount of Rs.3,11,18,457 was
disclosed in the regular returns
filed by the assessee. Neither the
amount disclosed in the return is
incorrect nor there is any new
material disclosed in the search.
In view of this no substantial
question of law arises. Appeal is
rejected.
(D.K.DESHMUKH, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.