Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/620/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/620/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-9,Mum v. M/S Vaspar Fischer Ltd

High Court 22 Sep 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/620/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-9,Mum v. M/S Vaspar Fischer Ltd
Date of order
22 Sep 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itxa/620/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-9,Mum v. M/S Vaspar Fischer Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.620 OF 2008 ----------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s appearances, Court’s orders order or directions ----------------------------------------------------- ¦ Mr.J.S.Saluja for the Appellant. ¦ Mr.V.S.Hadade for the Respondent. ¦ ¦ ¦ CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & ¦ J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. ¦ DATED:22ND SEPTEMBER, 2008 P.C.: Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant. There is a finding of fact recorded by the tribunal that the amount of Rs.3,11,18,457 was disclosed in the regular returns filed by the assessee. Neither the amount disclosed in the return is incorrect nor there is any new material disclosed in the search. In view of this no substantial question of law arises. Appeal is rejected. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan