Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/622/2003 Of M/S Jain Trading Co v....

Itxa/622/2003 Of M/S Jain Trading Co v. Income Tax,Officerward -1 3,Mumbai

High Court 20 Dec 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/622/2003 Of M/S Jain Trading Co v. Income Tax,Officerward -1 3,Mumbai
Date of order
20 Dec 2004
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itxa/622/2003 Of M/S Jain Trading Co v. Income Tax,Officerward -1 3,Mumbai, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.622 OF 2003 M/s.Jain Trading Co. .. Appellant. V/s. Income Tax Officer, Ward 13(2), Mumbai .. Respondent. Mr.K. Gopal for the appellant. Mr.R.V. Desai, senior counsel with Mr.A.S. Rao i/b. P. Kapur for the respondent. CORAM : R.M. LODHA, & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 20TH DECEMBER, 2004. P.C. : The learned counsel for the assessee prays for withdrawal of this appeal. 2, He submits that he is doing so because the assessee made the miscellaneous application for rectification of the impugned order and the said application having been dismissed, the assessee desires to challenge the order dismissing the assessee’s rectification application in appropriate proceedings before this Court. 3. Allowed to be withdrawn. (R.M. LODHA, J.) (R.M. LODHA, J.) 2 (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan