Itxa/623/2016 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. M/S. Hapag Lloyd (I) Pvt Ltd
High Court
10 Dec 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/623/2016 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. M/S. Hapag Lloyd (I) Pvt Ltd
Date of order
10 Dec 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/623/2016 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. M/S. Hapag Lloyd (I) Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Priya Soparkar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.623 OF 2016
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-7
… Appellant
V/s.
M/s Hapag Lloyd (I) Pvt. Ltd.
… Respondent
---
Mr.A.R.Malhotra with Mr. N.A.Kazi for the Appellant.Mr.Nishant Thakkar with Ms.Jasmine Amalsadvala i/by M/s PDSLegal for the Respondent.
---
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI AND
M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE : DECEMBER 10, 2018.
P.C.:-
1.This appeal is filed by the Revenue challenged the judgmentof Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 27[th] February, 2015.Upon perusal of the impugned judgment of the Tribunal, wenotice that the Tribunal has relied upon its own decision in case
of the Respondent-assessee for the earlier assessment yearsnamely assessment years 2008-2009 and 2009-2010.
Priya Soparkar
24 itxa 623-16-o
2.Learned counsel for the parties placed on record two ordersdated 20[th] June, 2018 and 14[th] August, 2018 passed by this Courtin Income Tax Appeal Nos.68 of 2016 and 71 of 2016, whichappeals related to the Tribunal's earlier orders concerning theassessee for the above noted assessment years. From such orderswe notice that pursuant to the judgment of the Tribunal impugnedin those appeals remanding the proceedings before the AssessingOfficer, fresh order was already passed. In that view of thematter, the Revenue had withdrawn the appeals. In the presentyear also identical situation obtains. The Tribunal havingremanded the proceedings ITO has already passed consequentialorder on 31[st] October, 2017, a copy of which is placed on recordby the counsel for the assessee. In the circumstances, this taxappeal is disposed of.
(M.S.SANKLECHA,J.)
(AKIL KURESHI,J.)….
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.