In Itxa/6240/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 4 Bombay v. Shri Suresh K. Jajoo, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Decision: Appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
The Commissioner of Income-tax.... Appellant.
Shri Suresh K. Jajoo.... Respondent.
Ms.Padma Divakaqr for the appellant.
Madhur Agrawal i/b. Mint & Conference for the respondent.
CORAM :V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 10[th] September 2009.
Heard learned counsel for the parties. Office objections are over-ruled. Appeal is taken up for hearing by consent of parties.
2.The appeal filed by the revenue challenging the order of the Tribunal, whereby order passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act was set aside, being Income Tax Appeal (L) No.424/2008 came to be dismissed vide order dated 23[rd ] July, 2009. In this view of the matter, the present appeal cannot be entertained. Appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue