In Itxa/6247/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax I Pune v. Ghodganga Ssk Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3.In the above view of the matter, appeal is dismissed for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2087 OF 2009ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2088 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
Ghodganga Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.
..Respondent.
Vimal Gupta for the appellant.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 10[th] September, 2009.
P.C. :-
Heard learned counsel for the revenue. Office objections are over-ruled. Appeals are taken up for hearing at the request of the appellant.
2.Learned counsel for the revenue fairly states that the question sought to be raised in this appeal is covered by the judgment delivered by this Court on 30th June, 2009 in the case of The Commissioner of Income Tax V/s.Kisanveer Satara Sakar Karkhana Ltd. in Income Tax Appeal No.930 of 2008.
3.In the above view of the matter, appeal is dismissed for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue