In Itxa/625/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 13 Mumbai v. M/S. Sukanraj Dhanraj And Son Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Appeal is, thus, dismissed in liminewith no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 625 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income-tax.V/s.M/s.Sukanraj Dhanraj & Sons.
... Appellant.
... Respondent.
Suresh Kumar for the appellant.
Ms.Suvarna Shendkar for the respondent.
P.C. :----
.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 28th April 2009.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2.
Having seen the order of the Tribunal, we
do not fine any substantial question of law involved
in the appeal. Appeal is, thus, dismissed in liminewith no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue