Itxa/6305/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -8 v. Apw President System Ltd
High Court
18 Nov 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/6305/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -8 v. Apw President System Ltd
Date of order
18 Nov 2011
Assessment year(s)
2003-04
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/6305/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -8 v. Apw President System Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: DATED : 18TH NOVEMBER, 2011 P.C. :- 1.Whether the ITAT was justified in deleting the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act' for short), is the question raised in this appeal.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.6305 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-8, Mumbai
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.APW President System Ltd.
..Respondent.
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Mr. Ajay Singh for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ.
DATED : 18TH NOVEMBER, 2011
P.C. :-
1.Whether the ITAT was justified in deleting the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act' for short), is the question raised in this appeal.
2.The assessment year involved herein is AY 2003-04.
3.The assessee was entitled to deduction under Section 35AB of the Act from the assessment years 1998-99 to 2002-03. It was the case of the assessee that in the assessment year in question, deduction
2 itxa6305-10
under Section 35AB of the Act was claimed inadvertently. The ITAT has accepted the contention of the assessee that the claim made by the assessee under Section 35AB of the Act in the assessment year in question was a bonafide mistake and, therefore, there is no ground for imposing penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. In our opinion, no fault can be found with the finding recorded by the ITAT. The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.
(A.R. JOSHI, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.