Itxa/6317/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ltu Mumbai v. M/S. Deposity Insurance And Credit Guarantee Corpporation
High Court
20 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/6317/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ltu Mumbai v. M/S. Deposity Insurance And Credit Guarantee Corpporation
Date of order
20 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/6317/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ltu Mumbai v. M/S. Deposity Insurance And Credit Guarantee Corpporation, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: All the three appeals stand dismissed with the aforesaid liberty reserved in favour of the appellant with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.917 OF OF 2009 ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.918 OF OF 2009 ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.919 OF OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
M/s.Deposit Insurance and Credit GuaranteeCorporation Ltd...Respondent.
Suresh Kumar for the appellant.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 20[th] July 2009.
P.C. :-
The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that before preferring the above appeals, permission from COD was not obtained. In this view of the matter, the above appeals are liable to be dismissed. However, liberty to the appellant to apply for recall of the order, if the appellant receives permission from COD.
All the three appeals stand dismissed with the aforesaid liberty reserved in favour of the appellant with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue