In Itxa/6321/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 24 Mumbai v. Malkani And Malkani Associates, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Decision: Appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL (LDG.) NO. 929 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income-tax-,
... Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Malkani & Malkani Associates.... Respondent.
Ms.Suchitra Kamble for the appellant.None for the respondent.
P.C. :
Heard. Office objections are overruled. Appeal is taken up for hearing by consent of parties.
2.The questions sought to be raised in this appeal relate to penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. After considering the factual aspects, the Tribunal has recorded finding of fact based on appreciation of evidence on record with which we do not find any fault. In this view of the matter, we see no substantial question of law involved in this appeal warranting admission thereof. Appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue