In Itxa/6324/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 12 Mumbai v. M/S. P.d. Kopthari And Co, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Decision: Accordingly, appeal is dismissed for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LDG.) NO. 937 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income-tax-,
... Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.P.D.Kothari & Co.
... Respondent.
Ms.Padma Vibhakar for the appellant.
None for the respondent.
P.C. :
Heard. Office objections are over-ruled. Appeal is taken
up for hearing at the request of the appellant.
2.Learned counsel appearing for the appellant fairly states that since the Tribunal has relied upon the circular issued by the Board, no substantial question of law arises out of the impugned order. Accordingly, appeal is dismissed for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue