In Itxa/6416/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Iii Pune v. Rajhans Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari Patsanstha, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Decision: For the same reasons, present appeal is dismissed for want of substantial question of law with tho order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2044 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income-tax.
... Appellant.
Rajhans Gramin Bigar Sheti SahakariPat Sanstha Ltd.... Respondent.
Vimal Gupta for the appellant.
Heard learned counsel for the appellant- revenue. Office objections are overruled. Appeal is taken up for hearing at the request of learned counsel for the appellant.
2.Learned counsel for the appellant- revenue submits that the question involved in the present appeal, in the identical facts and circumstances of the case has already been considered by this Court in ITXA No.2545/2008 and the said appeal was dismissed. For the same reasons, present appeal is dismissed for want of substantial question of law with tho order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue