Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/64/2011 Of Dharmik Exim Pvt. Ltd v....

Itxa/64/2011 Of Dharmik Exim Pvt. Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax -Ix

High Court 09 Jan 2012 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/64/2011 Of Dharmik Exim Pvt. Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax -Ix
Date of order
09 Jan 2012
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/64/2011 Of Dharmik Exim Pvt. Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax -Ix, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: DATED : 9TH JANUARY, 2012 P.C. :- 1.Whether the ITAT was justified in disallowing the purchases made by assessee from 8 parties amounting to Rs.3.79 crores, is the question raised in this appeal.

Decision: Since the assessee has furnished the permanent account numbers of the 8 parties from whom the purchases have been made by the assessee, we set aside the order of ITAT in so far as it relates to disallowing purchases amounting to Rs.3.79 crores and restore the matter to the file of ITAT for fresh con...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

mlns IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 64 OF 2011 Dharmik Exim Private Ltd- ..Appellant. V/s. Commissioner of Income Tax-IX Mumbai. ..Respondent. Mr.Pankaj R. Toprani for the appellant.Mr.Suresh Kumar for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 9TH JANUARY, 2012 P.C. :- 1.Whether the ITAT was justified in disallowing the purchases made by assessee from 8 parties amounting to Rs.3.79 crores, is the question raised in this appeal. The ITAT has dismissed the appeal filed by the Assessee mainly on the ground that the assessee failed to furnish the permanent account numbers of the 8 parties from whom the assessee claimed to have made purchases. It is the case of the assessee that the permanent account numbers of the 8 parties were in fact furnished during the course of assessment proceeding. The assessee has also filed an affidavit and stated on oath that the purchases made were from genuine parties whose permanent account numbers have been set out in the said affidavit. Since the assessee has furnished the permanent account numbers of the 8 parties from whom the purchases have been made by the assessee, we set aside the order of ITAT in so far as it relates to disallowing purchases amounting to Rs.3.79 crores and restore the matter to the file of ITAT for fresh consideration of the issue. 2. The appeal is disposed off accordingly with no order as to costs. (A.R. JOSHI, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan