In Itxa/64/2011 Of Dharmik Exim Pvt. Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax -Ix, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: DATED : 9TH JANUARY, 2012 P.C. :- 1.Whether the ITAT was justified in disallowing the purchases made by assessee from 8 parties amounting to Rs.3.79 crores, is the question raised in this appeal.
Decision: Since the assessee has furnished the permanent account numbers of the 8 parties from whom the purchases have been made by the assessee, we set aside the order of ITAT in so far as it relates to disallowing purchases amounting to Rs.3.79 crores and restore the matter to the file of ITAT for fresh con...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
mlns
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 64 OF 2011
Dharmik Exim Private Ltd-
..Appellant.
V/s.
Commissioner of Income Tax-IX Mumbai.
..Respondent.
Mr.Pankaj R. Toprani for the appellant.Mr.Suresh Kumar for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ.
DATED : 9TH JANUARY, 2012
P.C. :-
1.Whether the ITAT was justified in disallowing the purchases made by assessee from 8 parties amounting to Rs.3.79 crores, is the question raised in this appeal. The ITAT has dismissed the appeal filed by the Assessee mainly on the ground that the assessee failed to furnish the permanent account numbers of the 8 parties from whom the assessee claimed to have made purchases. It is the case of the assessee that the permanent account numbers of the 8 parties were in fact furnished during the course of assessment proceeding. The assessee has also filed an affidavit and stated on oath that the
purchases made were from genuine parties whose permanent account numbers have been set out in the said affidavit. Since the assessee has furnished the permanent account numbers of the 8 parties from whom the purchases have been made by the assessee, we set aside the order of ITAT in so far as it relates to disallowing purchases amounting to Rs.3.79 crores and restore the matter to the file of ITAT for fresh consideration of the issue.
2.
The appeal is disposed off accordingly with no order as to
costs.
(A.R. JOSHI, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.