Itxa/643/2007 Of M/S Regal Art Prints Mum v. The Income-Taxoficer,17(3)-4
High Court
02 Jul 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/643/2007 Of M/S Regal Art Prints Mum v. The Income-Taxoficer,17(3)-4
Date of order
02 Jul 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/643/2007 Of M/S Regal Art Prints Mum v. The Income-Taxoficer,17(3)-4, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In theabove view, the Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
* 1/1 *
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 643 OF 2007
M/s. Regal Art Prints….AppellantV/s.
The Income Tax Officer-17(3)(4)….Respondent
* * * * *
Mr. V.S. Hadade, Advocate for the appellant.
CORAM :- M.S. SANKLECHA, &
SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.DATE :-2ND JULY, 2018.
P.C. :-
1. Mr. Hadade, Learned Counsel appearing in supportof the Appeal states that inspite of best efforts, noinstructions were forthcoming from the appellant. In theabove view, the Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue