Itxa/6458/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-2,Mum v. M/S Union Bank Of India
High Court
29 Nov 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/6458/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-2,Mum v. M/S Union Bank Of India
Date of order
29 Nov 2011
Assessment year(s)
1999-2000
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itxa/6458/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-2,Mum v. M/S Union Bank Of India, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.6458 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Mumbai
..Appellant.
V/s.
Union of Bank of India
..Respondent.
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Mr. P.P. Tipnis i/b. Consulta Juris for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ.
DATED : 29TH NOVEMBER, 2011
P.C. :-
Counsel for the parties state that in view of the subsequent decision of the Special Bench of the Ahmedabad Tribunal in the case of Gujarat Financial Services Ltd. V/s. ACIT reported in [2008] 115 ITD 218 (SB), the question raised in this appeal may be restored to the file of the ITAT for fresh consideration in accordance with law. Accordingly, the impugned order of the ITAT dated 27/2/2007 in Interest Tax Appeal No.60/ Mum/2004 relating to AY 1999-2000 is quashed and set aside and the matter is restored to the file of the ITAT for fresh consideration in accordance with law. The appeal is disposed off accordingly with no order as to costs.
(A.R. JOSHI, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.