Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/6461/2010 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/6461/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S Birla Yamaha Ltd

High Court 21 Oct 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/6461/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S Birla Yamaha Ltd
Date of order
21 Oct 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/6461/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S Birla Yamaha Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: The question of law raised in this appeal reads thus :- " Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the ITAT was right in dismissing / rejecting revenue's ground of appeal No.2, challenging CIT(A)'s order deleting depreciation on foreign exchange rate fluctuation of Rs.16.22 lak...

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

sas IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.6461 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax-3, Mumbai ..Appellant. V/s. M/s. Birla Yamaha Ltd. ..Respondent. None for the appellant. Ms. A. Vissanji with S.J. Mehta for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND K.K. TATED, JJ. DATED : 21ST OCTOBER, 2011 P.C. :- 1.None present for the appellant. Heard learned counsel for the respondent. The question of law raised in this appeal reads thus :- " Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the ITAT was right in dismissing / rejecting revenue's ground of appeal No.2, challenging CIT(A)'s order deleting depreciation on foreign exchange rate fluctuation of Rs.16.22 lakhs, capitalized during the year on this account ? " 2.The aforesaid question stands covered against the revenue by the decision of this Court in the case of Padamjee Pulp and Paper 2 itxa6461-10 Mills Ltd. V/s. CIT reported in 210 ITR 97 and by the Apex Court in the case of CIT V/s. Woodward Governor India P. Ltd. reported in (2009) 312 I.T.R. 254 (S.C.). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (K.K. TATED, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan