Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/646/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/646/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-22, Mumbai v. M/S.j.j. Construction Co., Mumbai

High Court 31 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/646/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-22, Mumbai v. M/S.j.j. Construction Co., Mumbai
Date of order
31 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itxa/646/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-22, Mumbai v. M/S.j.j. Construction Co., Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.646 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s. J.J. Construction Co. ..Respondent. Mr. Suresh Kumar for appellant. Mr. Mandar Vaidya i/b. S.S. Shetty for respondent. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 31ST JULY, 2009. P.C. :- 1.Heard learned counsel for the parties. The question sought to be raised in the appeal has already been considered by this Court in the case of CWT V/s. HUF of Late H.H. Shri J.M. Scindia, W.T. No.1001 of 2007. Learned counsel for the revenue could not distinguish the said judgment. In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law is involved in the appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan