Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/649/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/649/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax.city-Iv, Mumbai v. M/S Mahbir Dyeing And Printing Mills (P) Ltd

High Court 08 Dec 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/649/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax.city-Iv, Mumbai v. M/S Mahbir Dyeing And Printing Mills (P) Ltd
Date of order
08 Dec 2008
Assessment year(s)
1992-93
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/649/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax.city-Iv, Mumbai v. M/S Mahbir Dyeing And Printing Mills (P) Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Hence appeal is dismissed at the admission stage with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.649 OF 2007 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.649 OF 2007 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.649 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Mahabir Dyeing & Printing Mills (P) Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.Vimal Gupta for applicant. Dr.K.Shivram with P.S.Savla for respondent. CORAM : P.B.MAJMUDAR ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 8TH DECEMBER, 2008. CORAM : P.B.MAJMUDAR AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 8TH DECEMBER, 2008. P.C. :- P.C. :- 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. The revenue has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 21/07/2003 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Bench-I. The dispute pertains to the assessment year 1992-93. 2. The Tribunal found that the undisclosed amount is the business income of the assessee. In this behalf, it has been found that the unaccounted profits earned by the assessee is from the business activity and the assessee had no other source of income except from the business transactions. The said finding is based on appreciation of evidence. - = : 2 : = - The Tribunal has also found that Revenue has not placed any evidence on record to establish that the assessee Company has other source of income, in addition to the business income. In our view, the said finding is a finding of fact and no substantial question of law arise in this appeal. Hence appeal is dismissed at the admission stage with no order as to costs. J.) (P.B.MAJMUDARJ.) (P.B.MAJMUDAR (P.B.MAJMUDAR (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan