Itxa/652/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 19 v. Kiran P. Kulkarni
High Court
08 Aug 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/652/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 19 v. Kiran P. Kulkarni
Date of order
08 Aug 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/652/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 19 v. Kiran P. Kulkarni, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
*1*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.652 OF 2012
The Commissioner of Income Tax-19-Versus-Kiran P. Kulkarni
..Appellant
..Respondent
...........
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.
...........
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARIAND B.P. COLABAWALLA, JJ.
DATE :- 8[th] August, 2014
P.C.:
1]We have heard Mr. Suresh Kumar, learned counsel, in support of this appeal. The concurrent orders passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal are restricting the penalty to a particular claim and, therefore, interfering with the order passed by the Assessing Officer to a limited extent and in facts and circumstances peculiar to the individual assessee. That we find that their orders do not raise any substantial question of law. Their orders must be seen as confined to the facts and circumstances and peculiar to the respondent-assessee's case. No general rule or principle which will affect any other cases or penalty proceedings, appears to have been laid down so
as to enable this Court to interfere with pure findings of fact and when they are not found to be perverse. The Appeal does not give rise to any substantial question of law. It is, therefore, dismissed. No costs.
(B.P.COLABAWALLA, J.)
(S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
wadhwa
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.