Itxa/660/2003 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Cityiii, Mumbai v. P. Ltd
High Court
29 Oct 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/660/2003 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Cityiii, Mumbai v. P. Ltd
Date of order
29 Oct 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itxa/660/2003 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Cityiii, Mumbai v. P. Ltd, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed in limine.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.660 OF 2003
The Commissioner of Income-tax,
City III, Mumbai .. Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Cygnus Negri Inv. P. Ltd. .. Respondent.
Mr.R.V. Desai, Senior counsel with Mr.A.S. Rao i/b.
S.S. Sarkar for the appellant.
CORAM : R.M. LODHA, &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 29TH OCTOBER, 2004.
P.C. :
Heard.
2. The Tribunal has relied upon the Division
Bench judgment of this Court in the case of CIT V/s.
J.K. Investors (Bom) Ltd. [248 ITR 769]. The
learned senior counsel for the revenue could not show
how the said judgment of the High court was not
applicable to the facts of the present case.
3. No substantial question of law arises in
this appeal. The appeal is dismissed in limine.
(R.M. LODHA, J.)
(R.M. LODHA, J.)
2
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue