Itxa/661/2016 Of Rp. Commissiner Of Income Tax-25 v. M/S Hatkesh Chs Ltd
High Court
27 Nov 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/661/2016 Of Rp. Commissiner Of Income Tax-25 v. M/S Hatkesh Chs Ltd
Date of order
27 Nov 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/661/2016 Of Rp. Commissiner Of Income Tax-25 v. M/S Hatkesh Chs Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Mohanty on behalf of the Revenue, these six appeals are dismissed as not pressed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 661 OF 2016WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 662 OF 2016 WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 663 OF 2016WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 664 OF 2016WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 665 OF 2016WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 671 OF 2016
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-25
.. Appellant
v/s.
M/s. Hatkesh CHS Ltd.
.. Respondent
Mr. N.C. Mohanty for the appellant None for the respondent
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI & M.S. SANKLECHA, J.J.
P.C.
DATED : 27[th] NOVEMBER, 2018.
1.All these appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act arisefrom a common order dated 20[th] May, 2015 from the order of theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal.
2.Mr. Mohanty, learned Counsel appearing for the Revenue, on
instructions, states that as tax effect involved in all these appeals beingless than the threshold limit as provided under the CBDT CircularNo.3/2018, dated 11[th] July, 2018, he has been instructed not to pressthe present appeals.
3.In view of the statement made by Mr. Mohanty on behalf of the
Revenue, these six appeals are dismissed as not pressed.
4.Refund of Court fees as per Rules.
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
(AKIL KURESHI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.