Itxa/667/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -7, Mumbai v. M/S Western Refrigeration Ltd
High Court
14 Oct 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/667/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -7, Mumbai v. M/S Western Refrigeration Ltd
Date of order
14 Oct 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/667/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -7, Mumbai v. M/S Western Refrigeration Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
AGK IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.667 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income-tax-7 ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Western Refrigeration Ltd., ..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.
CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 14TH OCTOBER, 2008.
P.C. :
1. In this case, the respondent / assessee
had borrowed interest bearing loans and had also
advanced interest free loans to the extent of Rs.29
lakhs to a relative of the director of the assessee
Company. The assessing officer disallowed interest
to the extent relatable to the interest free loan
advanced by the assessee. The tribunal deleted the
disallowance.
2. The finding recorded by the tribunal is
that the assessee had advanced interest free loans
out of the sale proceeds received by the assessee
and not from the interest bearing loans availed by
the assessee.
3. The learned counsel for the appellant
relied upon the judgment of the Punjab and Haryana
High Court in the case of Commissioner of
Income-tax V/s. Abhishek Industries Limited
reported in [2006] 286 ITR 0001. In our opinion,
that decision is wholly distinguishable on facts.
In that case, substantial portion of the interest
bearing loans taken by the assessee were advanced
to the sister concern of the assessee. In the
present case, the findings recorded by the Tribunal
is that interest loans taken by the assessee were
not advanced to the sister of the director of the
assessee.
4. Thus, the decision of the Tribunal is
based on facts. No question of law arises from the
order of the tribunal. Hence, dismissed.
D.K. DESHMUKH, J.
J.P. DEVADHAR, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.