In Itxa/668/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Vi Mumbai v. M/S. Mds Switchgear Limited, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Appeal is, therefore, dismissed for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 668 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income-tax-,
... Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.MDS Switchgear Limited.... Respondent.
J.S.Saluja for the appellant.
Ms.Vasanti Patel for the respondent.
CORAM :V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 9[th] June 2009.
P.C. :
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
By the impugned judgment, the Tribunal has remanded the matter back for fresh hearing as such no substantial question of law is involved arising out of the impugned judgment. Appeal is, therefore, dismissed for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue