Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/669/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -8 , Mumbai v. M/S Palombee Securities And Finance Ltd, Mumbai
Date of order
09 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
In Itxa/669/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -8 , Mumbai v. M/S Palombee Securities And Finance Ltd, Mumbai, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Decision: Appeal is, therefore, dismissed for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 669 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income-tax-,
... Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Palombee Securities and Finance Ltd.... Respondent.
Suresh Kumar for the appellant.
None for the respondent.
DATED : 9[th] June 2009.
P.C. :
Heard learned counsel for the appellant.
The Tribunal has recorded finding of fact while deleting penalty under section 271(1) of the Income Tax Act. Having seen the findings of fact recorded by the Tribunal, we see no substantial question of law involved in this appeal. Appeal is, therefore, dismissed for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue