Itxa/670/2008 Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax-7,Mum v. M/S National Organic Chemical Indus. Ltd
High Court
15 Oct 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/670/2008 Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax-7,Mum v. M/S National Organic Chemical Indus. Ltd
Date of order
15 Oct 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Itxa/670/2008 Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax-7,Mum v. M/S National Organic Chemical Indus. Ltd, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Appeal is dismissed with no order as tocosts. .
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.670 OF 2008The Commissioner of Income Tax-7,Aayakar Bhavan, Mumbai 400 020...Appellantv/sM/s National Organic Chemical Industries
Ltd., Nariman Point, Mumbai 400 021 ...Respondents
Mr Suresh Kona for Appellant.
Mr Dinesh Vyas with Mr P.C. Tripathi for Respondents.
CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH AND J.P. DEVADHAR JJ.DATE : 15TH OCTOBER 2008
P.C.-
1.
The Commissioner of Income Tax has raised four
Fry (India) P.Ltd. is contrary to law, we see no reason
to entertain the first question.
2.
As regards question Nos.2 and 3 are concerned,
therefore we see no reason to entertain these questions.
3.
as regards question No.4 is concerned, the
does not arise. Appeal is dismissed with no order as tocosts.
.
Parties to act on the copy of this order duly
authenticated by the Associate / Private Secretary ofthe Court.
.
Certified copy is expedited.
( D.K. DESHMUKH J.)
( J.P. DEVADHAR J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.