Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/671/2003 Of Chintamani Nagri Sahaka...

Itxa/671/2003 Of Chintamani Nagri Sahakari Pat.sanstha Ltd v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income- Tax,Range-3

High Court 03 Nov 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/671/2003 Of Chintamani Nagri Sahakari Pat.sanstha Ltd v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income- Tax,Range-3
Date of order
03 Nov 2004
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itxa/671/2003 Of Chintamani Nagri Sahakari Pat.sanstha Ltd v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income- Tax,Range-3, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.

Decision: The appeal is dismissed in limine.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.671 OF 2003 Chintamani Nagri Sahakari Pat Sanstha Limited .. Appellant. V/s. The Addl. Commissioner of Income-tax, Range-3, Kolhapur .. Respondent. Mr.S.N. Inamdar for the appellant. Mr.R.V. Desai, senior counsel with Ms.S.V. Bharucha for the respondent. CORAM : R.M. LODHA, & CORAM : R.M. LODHA, &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 3RD NOVEMBER, 2004. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 3RD NOVEMBER, 2004. P.C. : Heard Mr.S.N. Inamdar, the learned counsel for the appellant - assessee. 2. The Tribunal in the impugned order observed thus : ". After hearing both the sides and considering the material on record, I find that the facts and circumstances with respect to this penalty are similar to the penalty under Section 271D and since violation is there and the assessee has not been able to establish that he had any reasonable cause not to make the payment through crossed cheque/draft, therefore, penalty has rightly been held to be leviable in view of provisions contained in the Act and the decision taken by the Pune Bench as relied upon by the learned CIT(A), so action of the authorities below 2 is free from any infirmity and penalty is confirmed." 3. The consideration of the matter by the Tribunal does not suffer from any legal infirmity. The findings are concluded on facts. 4. No substantial question of law arises in this appeal. The appeal is dismissed in limine. (R.M. LODHA, J.) (R.M. LODHA, J.) (R.M. LODHA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan