Case Law › High Court › Itxa/67/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Itxa/67/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Shir Amitabh Bachan

High Court 09 Aug 2018 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

09 Aug 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/67/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Shir Amitabh Bachan, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 3.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 67 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax .. Appellant v/s. Amitabh Bachchan ..Respondent None for the appellant Mr. Atul K. Jasani for the respondent CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.J. P.C. DATED : 9[th] AUGUST, 2018. 1.Today, when this appeal was called out earlier, none appeared insupport of the appeal. Therefore, the appeal was kept back. On beingcalled the second time also none appeared in support of the appeal. 2.It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the present appeal. This is more particularly so as the parties and advocate were put to notice on 27[th] July, 2018 that this appeal would be taken upfor consideration today. 3.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. (SANDEEP K. SHINDE J.) Digitallysigned byUdayUday ShivajiJagtapShivajiDate:2018.08.13Jagtap10:53:55+0530 (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.