Itxa/673/2003 Of Commissioner Of Income- Tax,City,Xx.mumbai v. Mrs. Usha O.jhujhunwala
High Court
03 Nov 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/673/2003 Of Commissioner Of Income- Tax,City,Xx.mumbai v. Mrs. Usha O.jhujhunwala
Date of order
03 Nov 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/673/2003 Of Commissioner Of Income- Tax,City,Xx.mumbai v. Mrs. Usha O.jhujhunwala, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed in limine.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.673 OF 2003
The Commissioner of Income-tax,
Mumbai City-20, Mumbai .. Appellant.
V/s.
Usha O. Jhunjhunwala .. Respondent.
None present.
CORAM : R.M. LODHA, &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 3RD NOVEMBER, 2004.
CORAM : R.M. LODHA, &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 3RD NOVEMBER, 2004.
P.C. :
None appears for the revenue-appellant.
2. As it is the matter stands concluded by
the Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case
of Cadell Weaving Mill Co. P. Limited V/s. CIT
[249 ITR 265].
3. No substantial question of law arises in
this appeal. The appeal is dismissed in limine.
(R.M. LODHA, J.)
(R.M. LODHA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue