Itxa/674/2015 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax - 2 v. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd
High Court
01 Aug 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/674/2015 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax - 2 v. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd
Date of order
01 Aug 2017
Assessment year(s)
2007-08
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/674/2015 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax - 2 v. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 4.The Appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 674 of 2015
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2
.. Appellant
v/s.
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.
.. Respondent
Mr. Suresh Kumar a/w Ms. Samiksha Kanani for the appellant Mr. J.D. Mistri, Senior Counsel a/w Mr. Atul K. Jasani for the respondent
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA & A.M. BADAR, J.J.
DATED : 1[st] AUGUST, 2017
P.C.
1.The appeal pertains to Assessment Year 2007-08.
2.The learned Counsel for the appellant and the learned Senior Counsel for the respondent are at ad idem that the issue raised in the present appeal is covered by the judgment of this Court in Income Tax Appeal Nos.1659 of 2013, 264 of 2014 so also in Income Tax Appeal (L) No.2131 of 2012 with other connected matters, decided on 7[th] March, 2013.
3.In the light of the above, the question as raised does not give rise to any substantial question of law.
4.The Appeal is dismissed. No costs.
(A.M. BADAR, J.)
(S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.