Case Law › High Court › Itxa/6773/2010 Of The Director Of Income...

Itxa/6773/2010 Of The Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation) v. Lagship Indian Investment Company (Mauritius ) Ltd

High Court 25 Aug 2021 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

25 Aug 2021

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/6773/2010 Of The Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation) v. Lagship Indian Investment Company (Mauritius ) Ltd, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

PURTI IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYPRASADPARABORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONDigitally signed byPURTI PRASADPARABPRASADPARABORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONDigitally signed byPURTI PRASADPARABDate: 2021.08.2610:23:50 +0530INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 6773 OF 2010 The Director of Income Tax(International Taxation) V/s.Flagship Indian Investment Company(Mauritius) Ltd. ….Appellant …Respondent ---- Mr. Suresh Kumar for Appellant.Mr. Vijay Bhate i/b PDS Legal for Respondent. ---- CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &ABHAY AHUJA, JJ. DATED : 25[th] AUGUST 2021 P.C. : 1.Mr. Suresh Kumar seeks leave to withdraw the appeal. 2. Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. 3. Refund of court fee, if any, be paid in accordance with rules. (ABHAY AHUJA, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.