Case Law › High Court › Itxa/680/2007 Of The Commission Of Incom...

Itxa/680/2007 Of The Commission Of Income-Tax-13 v. M/S Fourways International

High Court 19 Jan 2009 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

19 Jan 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/680/2007 Of The Commission Of Income-Tax-13 v. M/S Fourways International, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: For the reasons stated therein the present appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.680 OF 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.680 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Fourways International ..Respondent. Dr.A.S.Shivram for appellant. None present for respondent. CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 19TH JANUARY, 2009. CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 19TH JANUARY, 2009. P.C. :- P.C. :- Similar appeals filed by the appellant being Income Tax Appeal No.55 of 2007 and 557 of 2007 have been disposed of by us today by answering the questions in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. For the reasons stated therein the present appeal is dismissed. (SMT.RANJANA DESAI, J.) (SMT.RANJANA DESAI, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.