Case Law › High Court › Itxa/68/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Itxa/68/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Parmar Synthetics Pvt. Ltd

High Court 25 Jun 2008 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

25 Jun 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/68/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Parmar Synthetics Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: P.C. :.As this Court has decided the similar issue inanother matter, the learned Counsel seeks to withdrawthe appeal.2.The Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.3.Refund of Court fees, if any, as per rules.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 68 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income-tax-4,Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road,Mumbai - 400 020.... Appellant.V/s.M/s. Parmar Synthetics Pvt. Ltd.7, Dady Seth Agiary Lane, 2nd floor,Kalbadevi, Mumbai - 400 002.... Respondents....Mr. R.G. Bhatt for the Appellant.Mr. A.K. Jasani for the Respondents.... CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &K.U. CHANDIWAL,JJ.DATE : 25TH JUNE, 2008. P.C. :.As this Court has decided the similar issue inanother matter, the learned Counsel seeks to withdrawthe appeal.2.The Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.3.Refund of Court fees, if any, as per rules. (F.I. REBELLO, J.) (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.