In Itxa/682/2003 Of The Director Of Income- Tax,(Exewmtions),Mumbai v. M/S Taparia Foundation, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Decision: The appeal does not give substantial question of law and is dismissed inlimine. rise to any (R.M.LODHA, J.) (J.P.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O.O.C.J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.682 OF 2003
The Director of Income Tax,(Exemption), Mumbai
v/s.
M/s. Taparia Foundation
.. Appellant
.. Respondent
Ms.S.V.Bharucha i/by Mr.S.S.Sarkar for theappellant.
P.C.
Heard.
CORAM: R.M.LODHA ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED:25thNovember, 2004
2001 upon which reliance has been placed in the
impugned order does not hold the field.
4. The appeal does not give substantial question of law and is dismissed inlimine.
rise to any
(R.M.LODHA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue