Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/683/2003 Of The Director Of Income-...

Itxa/683/2003 Of The Director Of Income- Tax,(Exemptions) Mumbai v. Seth Hansraj P.thakersey Education Fund

High Court 25 Nov 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/683/2003 Of The Director Of Income- Tax,(Exemptions) Mumbai v. Seth Hansraj P.thakersey Education Fund
Date of order
25 Nov 2004
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itxa/683/2003 Of The Director Of Income- Tax,(Exemptions) Mumbai v. Seth Hansraj P.thakersey Education Fund, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.683 OF 2003 The Director of Income Tax,(Exemption), Mumbai.. Appellant v/s. Seth Hansraj Pragji ThackerseyEducation Fund. .. Respondent Ms.S.V.Bharucha i/by Mr.S.S.Sarkar for theappellant. P.C. Heard. CORAM: R.M.LODHA ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED:25thNovember, 2004 substantial question of law and is dismissed inlimine. (R.M.LODHA, J.)(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan