Itxa/6855/2010 Of The Commissione Rof Income-Tax-26,Mum v. Mr Chales A.h.alexander
High Court
11 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/6855/2010 Of The Commissione Rof Income-Tax-26,Mum v. Mr Chales A.h.alexander
Date of order
11 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/6855/2010 Of The Commissione Rof Income-Tax-26,Mum v. Mr Chales A.h.alexander, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: P.C. :- P.C. :- In view of the dismissal of the Notice of Motion, the appeal also stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.707 OF 2006
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.707 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
Shri Charles A.H. Alexander ..Respondent.
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.
None for respondent.
CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 11TH APRIL, 2008.
CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 11TH APRIL, 2008.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
In view of the dismissal of the Notice of
Motion, the appeal also stands dismissed.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue