Itxa/69/2015 Of Director Of Income Tax (Exemption) v. Vedanta Foundation
High Court
24 Jul 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/69/2015 Of Director Of Income Tax (Exemption) v. Vedanta Foundation
Date of order
24 Jul 2017
Assessment year(s)
2010-11, 2008-09, 2009-10
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Itxa/69/2015 Of Director Of Income Tax (Exemption) v. Vedanta Foundation, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDITION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.69 OF 2015
Director of Income Tax (Exemption), Mumbai ...AppellantV/s.Vedanta Foundation, Mumbai ...Respondent.....
Mr.Suresh Kumar with Ms.Samiksha Kanan, Advocate for theAppellant.
Mr.Percy Pardiwalla, Senior Counsel with Miss.Aasifa Chan andMr.Atul K. Jasani, Advocate for the Respondent.
....
CORAM :S.V.GANGAPURWALA &A.M.BADAR JJ.
DATED :24[th] July 2017.
P.C.
1The present Appeal pertains to the Assessment Year2010-11.
2With regard to the issue of exemption claimed by theAssessee under Section 11(1) and Section 11(1)(d) of the IncomeTax Act, the Tribunal has considered the Judgment in the case ofpresent Assessee for the Assessment Year 2008-09. It is submittedthat with regard to the Assessment Year 2009-10, the exemptionunder said sections was allowed by the Commissioner and theAssessing Officer has accepted the said Order and did not fileappeal before the Tribunal.
3In both the earlier years i.e. Assessment Years 2008-09and 2009-10, the same issue between the parties has become final.Considering the principle of consistency, the present Appeal standsdismissed.
4No costs.
( A.M.BADAR J.)
( S.V.GANGAPURWALA J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.