Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/6976/2010 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/6976/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 2 Mumbai v. Vaman Prestresing Co Ltd

High Court 17 Dec 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/6976/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 2 Mumbai v. Vaman Prestresing Co Ltd
Date of order
17 Dec 2012
Assessment year(s)
2003-04
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itxa/6976/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 2 Mumbai v. Vaman Prestresing Co Ltd, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: SANKLECHA, JJ.DATED : 17TH DECEMBER, 2012 P.C. :- 1.Whether the ITAT was justified in confirming the order of the CIT(A) and deleting the disallowance of interest amounting to Rs.20,13,833/-, is the question raised in this appeal.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
itxa6976-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.6976 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Mumbai ..Appellant. V/s. M/s. Vaman Prestressing Co. Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr. Suresh Kumar for the appellant. Mr.P.J.Pardiwala, senior Advocate with Atul K.Jasani for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.DATED : 17TH DECEMBER, 2012 P.C. :- 1.Whether the ITAT was justified in confirming the order of the CIT(A) and deleting the disallowance of interest amounting to Rs.20,13,833/-, is the question raised in this appeal. 2.The assessment year involved herein is AY 2003-04. 3.In the assessment year in question, the assessing officer made a proportionate disallowance of interest on the ground that the assessee had utilized interest bearing funds for the purpose of advancing the amount of Rs.2.20 crores towards share application money without charging any interest and that the assessee failed to establish the nexus. The CIT(A) as well as the ITAT have held that the investments in the share application money were made for the purposes of the business of the assessee and that the said investments were made out of the assessee's own funds and not from the borrowed funds. Since the decision of the ITAT is based on finding of fact, we see no reason to entertain the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan