Itxa/704/2002 Of Bhupendra C. Modi v. Income Tax Officer, Wd.22(3) Mumbai
High Court
21 Sep 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/704/2002 Of Bhupendra C. Modi v. Income Tax Officer, Wd.22(3) Mumbai
Date of order
21 Sep 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itxa/704/2002 Of Bhupendra C. Modi v. Income Tax Officer, Wd.22(3) Mumbai, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed in limine.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.704 OF 2002
Mr.Bhupendra C. Modi .. Appellant.
V/s.
Income Tax Officer, Ward 22(3),
Mumbai .. Respondent.
Mr.Vipul Joshi & Sameer G. Dalal for the appellant.
Mr.R.V. Desai, Senior counsel with Vijay Kantharia
i/b. P. Kapur for the respondent.
CORAM : R.M. LODHA, &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
CORAM : R.M. LODHA, &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 21ST SEPTEMBER, 2004.
P.C. :
Heard.
2. The consideration of the matter by the
Tribunal is concluded on facts. We do not find any
merit in the submission of the learned counsel for
the assessee that the findings are perverse. The
findings of the Tribunal are based on material.
3. No substantial question of law arises in
this appeal. The appeal is dismissed in limine.
(R.M. LODHA, J.)
(R.M. LODHA, J.)
2
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue