Itxa/713/2004 Of Bhogawati Ssk Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
02 May 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/713/2004 Of Bhogawati Ssk Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
02 May 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itxa/713/2004 Of Bhogawati Ssk Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.
Issue: Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the appellate tribunal was justified in disallowing interest actually paid by the appellant on the above deposits and treating the same as income of the appellant ? the same is answered by the Apex Court in the case of Siddheshwar SSK Ltd.,...
Decision: The Income Tax appeal stands disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.713 OF 2004
Bhogwati SSK Ltd., Kolhapur .. Appellant.
V/s.
Dy. CIT., SR-1, Kolhapur .. Respondent.
Mr.Pramod Vaidya for the appellant.
Mr.A.S. Rao for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 2ND MAY, 2005.
P.C. :
1. Heard rival parties. Following two
questions are raised in this appeal :
1. Whether on the facts and in the
circumstances of the case and in law the
appellate Tribunal was justified in
sustaining the additions by treating the
amounts of non refundable deposits which
were converted in to the share capital or
repaid, as income of appellant ?
2. Whether on the facts and in the
circumstances of the case, the appellate
tribunal was justified in disallowing
interest actually paid by the appellant on
the above deposits and treating the same as
income of the appellant ?
the same is answered by the Apex Court in the case of
Siddheshwar SSK Ltd., V/s. C.I.T. & Others [(2004)
270 ITR 1 (SC)] in favour of the assessee and against
the revenue. Accordingly, the above question is
answered in terms of that judgment.
2
3. So far as question No.2 above is concerned,
it relates to the interest on non-refundable
deposits. In the light of Apex Court judgment in the
case of Siddheshwar SSK Ltd. (supra), the Tribunal
shall consider the same afresh.
4. In this view of the matter, the impugned
order passed by the Tribunal to the above extent is
set aside and the appeal is remanded back to the
Tribunal for consideration afresh in the light of the
judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Siddheshwar
SSK Ltd. (supra).
5. The Income Tax appeal stands disposed of.
(V.C. DAGA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.