Itxa/714/2004 Of Vishwasrao Nail Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Spl. Range-3 Solapur
High Court
22 Feb 2006 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/714/2004 Of Vishwasrao Nail Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Spl. Range-3 Solapur
Date of order
22 Feb 2006
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itxa/714/2004 Of Vishwasrao Nail Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Spl. Range-3 Solapur, the High Court (2006) decided the matter.
Decision: Having regard to the aforesaid facts and circumstances, we allow the appeal and set aside the order passed by the I.T.A.T., Pune dated 12/10/2003 and remand back the same to I.T.A.T. to decide the appeal afresh in the light of the Judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Siddheshwar Sahakari Sakhar...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.714 OF 2004
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.714 OF 2004
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.714 OF 2004
Vishwasrao Naik Sahakari Sakhar
Karkhana Ltd. ..Appellant.
V/s.
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax ..Respondent.
Mr.P.G.Chavan with S.S.Patwardhan for appellant.
Mr.Prashant Uchil for respondent.
CORAM : Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM : Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM : Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 22ND FEBRUARY, 2006.
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 22ND FEBRUARY, 2006.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant
and the respondents. The learned counsel for the
appellant brought to our notice that the Hon’ble Supreme
Court in the case of Siddheshwar Sahakari Sakhar
Siddheshwar Sahakari Sakhar
Karkhana Ltd. V/s. Commissioner of Income Tax,
Karkhana Ltd. V/s. Commissioner of Income Tax,
Kolhapur & Ors.
Kolhapur & Ors. reported in 270 I.T.R.1 has partially
overruled the Judgment and order of our High Court in
(2000) 245 I.T.R. 498. Having regard to the aforesaid
facts and circumstances, we allow the appeal and set
aside the order passed by the I.T.A.T., Pune dated
12/10/2003 and remand back the same to I.T.A.T. to
decide the appeal afresh in the light of the Judgment of
the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Siddheshwar Sahakari Sakhar
Siddheshwar Sahakari Sakhar
Karhana Ltd.
Karhana Ltd. (supra).
2. Hence appeal stands disposed off in the above
terms with no order as to costs.
(Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(J. P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.