Itxa/714/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -7 ,Mumbai v. Zandu Pharmaceuticals Works Limited
High Court
13 Oct 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/714/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -7 ,Mumbai v. Zandu Pharmaceuticals Works Limited
Date of order
13 Oct 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/714/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -7 ,Mumbai v. Zandu Pharmaceuticals Works Limited, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence, all these appeals are dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O.O.C.J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.714 OF 2008
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.715 OF 2008
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.719 OF 2008
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.720 OF 2008
-----------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office
Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s
appearances, Court’s orders
order or directions
-----------------------------------------------------
¦ Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellants
¦ Ms.Aasifa Khan for the Respondent.
¦
¦
¦ CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH &
¦ J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
¦ DATED:13TH OCTOBER, 2008
P.C.:
In all these matters the Revenue has
filed appeals against the order of
the Tribunal remanding the matter
back to the file of the Assessing
Officer for denovo investigation
relying on the decision of the
Tribunal in the case of Foods
Speciality Ltd. v/s. ACIT reported
in 54 ITD 352. Since the matters
are only remanded back for denovo
- 2 -
consideration, in our opinion, no
question of law arises. Hence, all
these appeals are dismissed.
(D.K.DESHMUKH, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.