Itxa/714/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -2 v. Archway Investment Co.ltd
High Court
17 Dec 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/714/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -2 v. Archway Investment Co.ltd
Date of order
17 Dec 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/714/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -2 v. Archway Investment Co.ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3.Accordingly, all these Appeals are dismissed as not pressed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Priya Soparkar
181, 86, 92, 93, 94, 97, 98 itxa-o
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.417 OF 2018
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax 2
V/s.M/s Trans Impex Pvt. Ltd.
… Appellant
… Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.513 OF 2018
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-14
V/s.
ITD Cementation India Ltd.
… Appellant
… Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.697 OF 2018
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2… Appellant
V/s.
Sukan Agencies Pvt. Ltd. … Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.714 OF 2018
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.718 OF 2018
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2… Appellant
V/s.Archway Investment Co. Ltd.
… Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.950 OF 2018
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-11… Appellant
V/s.
Wilhelmsen Ship Management (India) Pvt. Ltd.… Respondent
Priya Soparkar
281, 86, 92, 93, 94, 97, 98 itxa-o
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1056 OF 2018
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-4
… Appellant
V/s.The New Piece Goods Bazar Co. Ltd. … Respondent
---
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellants.
Mr.Ojas Gole with Ms.Jasmin Amalsadvala for the Respondent inITXA No.417 of 2018.
Mr.N. Parwal for the Respondent in ITXA No.697 of 2018.
Mr.Atul Jasani for the Respondent in ITXA No.714 of 2018 and718 of 2018.
Mr.Rajesh Poojary i/by M/s MINT & CONFRERES for theRespondent in ITXA No.950 of 2018.
Mr.Mayank Thosar i/by Mr.B.V.Jhaveri for the Respondent inITXA No.1056 of 2018.
---
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI AND
M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE : DECEMBER 17, 2018.
P.C.:-
1.These Appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act,
1961 (the Act) challenge the orders passed by the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal (the Tribunal).
2.Mr.Suresh Kumar, learned Counsel appearing for the
Revenue states that he has been instructed not to press these
appeals. This for the reason that the tax effect in each of these
Priya Soparkar
381, 86, 92, 93, 94, 97, 98 itxa-o
appeals is less than Rs.50 lakhs as provided in CBDT Circular No.3
of 2018 dated 11[th] July, 2018.
3.Accordingly, all these Appeals are dismissed as not pressed.
4.Refund of Court Fees, as per Rules.
(M.S.SANKLECHA,J.)
(AKIL KURESHI,J.)
….
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue