In Itxa/717/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. M/S Mahindra British Telecom Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.717 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
V/s.
M/s.Mahindra Britsh Telecom Ltd.
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
None for appellant.Mr.P.J.Pardiwala,senior Advocate with A.K. Jasani for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 12TH JUNE, 2009.
P.C. :-
None present on behalf of the revenue. Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.