Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/717/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/717/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 14 v. M/S.bombay Beads Centre

High Court 11 Jan 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/717/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 14 v. M/S.bombay Beads Centre
Date of order
11 Jan 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/717/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 14 v. M/S.bombay Beads Centre, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 4Accordingly, appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO. 1150 OF 2012 The Commissioner of Income-Tax, 14, Mumbai..Appellant.V/s.M/s. Bombay Beads Centre..Respondent. Mr. P. C. Chhotaray, for the Appellant.Mr. R. Murlidhar with Mr. A.K. Jasani, for the Respondent. P.C:- CORAM: J.P.DEVADHAR & M.S.SANKLECHA,JJ.DATE : 11[th] JANUARY, 2013. In this Appeal, the revenue has raised the following question of law:- “Whether on the facts and the circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon'ble ITAT erred in directing the AO that the seized cash of Rs.90,31,000/- be treated as advance tax and assessee be given credit thereof calculating the tax and interest liability specially when this amount has not been paid as advance tax within the provision of Income Tax Act,1961.?” 2We find that the above issue had come up for consideration before this Court in Income Tax Appeal No.3741 of 2010 in the matter of Commissioner of Income Tax-Central-1 v/s. Shri Jyotindra B. Mody and by order dated 21[st] September, 2011, this Court has held that seized cash could be adjusted against advance tax liability while calculating the interest under the Income Tax Act, 1961. 3In view of the decision of this Court in the matter of Jyotindra Modi (supra), the question raised in this Appeal need not be entertained. 4Accordingly, appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (M.S.SANKLECHA,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan