Itxa/720/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Iii, Pune v. Shriram Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. , Satara
High Court
30 Jun 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/720/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Iii, Pune v. Shriram Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. , Satara
Date of order
30 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/720/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Iii, Pune v. Shriram Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. , Satara, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 4.In this view of the matter, the appeal is liable to be dismissed for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.720 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
Shriram Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd...Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta for appellant.Mr.A.K.Jasani for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 30TH JUNE, 2009.
P.C. :-
1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue and the respondent. Learned counsel for the revenue fairly states that so far as the question (A) is concerned, the same is covered by the judgment of this Court delivered on 30th June, 2009 in the case of The Commissioner ofIncome Tax V/s. Kisanveer Satara Sakar Karkhana Ltd. in
Income Tax Appeal No.930 of 2008.
2.So far question (B) is concerned, the same is
covered by the judgment delivered of this Court in the case of CIT V/s. Manjara Shetkari Sahakari SakharKarkhana Ltd. reported in [2008] 301 I.T.R. 191.
3.So far as question (C) is concerned, it does not arise.
4.In this view of the matter, the appeal is
liable to be dismissed for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.