In Itxa/728/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-11, Mumbai v. Jyoti Prakash Dutta, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.728 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax..Appellant.
V/s.
Jyoti Prakash Dutta
..Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta for appellant.Mr.Ajay Singh for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 12TH JUNE, 2009.
P.C. :-
Heard learned counsel for the revenue. He fairly states that the question sought to be raised in this appeal is covered by the judgment of this court in the case of C.I.T. V/s. D.K.Kondkereported in (1991) 192I.T.R. 128. In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law arise in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue