Itxa/730/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - V v. Dhondiba Ganpat Gawade,(H.u.f)
High Court
14 Jan 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/730/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - V v. Dhondiba Ganpat Gawade,(H.u.f)
Date of order
14 Jan 2013
Assessment year(s)
1991-92
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/730/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - V v. Dhondiba Ganpat Gawade,(H.u.f), the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: SANKLECHA, JJ.DATED : 14TH JANUARY, 2013 P.C. :- 1.In this appeal filed by the revenue for the assessment year 1991-92, the following questions of law has been raised for consideration of this Court :- (i)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justifie...
Decision: 3.The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.1393 OF 2012
The Commissioner of Income Tax-V, Pune
..Appellant.
V/s.
Dhondiba Gapat Gawade (HUF)
..Respondent.
Mr. Tejveer Singh for the appellant.None for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.DATED : 14TH JANUARY, 2013
P.C. :-
1.In this appeal filed by the revenue for the assessment year 1991-92, the following questions of law has been raised for consideration of this Court :-
(i)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in dismissing the appeal without going in the merit of ground raised in revenue's appeal only by referring to the monetary limit laid down for filing of appeal in CBDT's instruction No.3/2011 dated 9/2/2011, which was in effect
on the date when the appeal in the case was filed. The appeal was as per the limit available in instruction effective then ?
(ii)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was right in ignoring para 11 of the CBDT's instruction No.3/2011 which clearly states that “This instruction will apply to appeals filed on or after 9[th] February, 2011. However, cases where appeals have been filed before 9[th ]February, 2011 will be governed by the instructions on this subject, operative at the time when such appeal was filed ?
2.The tax effect involved in the present matter is less than Rs. 2 lakhs. Counsel for the revenue fairly states that there is no cascading effect with regard to the issue in the subsequent years. In view of the above, we see no reason to entertain the questions as formulated above.
3.The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.