Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/731/2014 Of Director Of Income Tax(...

Itxa/731/2014 Of Director Of Income Tax(It)-I v. M/S. Societe Gererale

High Court 05 Oct 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/731/2014 Of Director Of Income Tax(It)-I v. M/S. Societe Gererale
Date of order
05 Oct 2016
Assessment year(s)
2000-01, 2001-02
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/731/2014 Of Director Of Income Tax(It)-I v. M/S. Societe Gererale, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: 2.The appellant Revenue urges following question of law for our consideration :- (i)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal erred in holding that no disallowance of interest u/s 14A needs to be made even when the assessee has not been able to establish nexu...

Decision: 4.The appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 731 OF 2014 Director of Income Tax (IT)-1,Mumbai .. Appellant v/s. M/s. SocieteGenerale Maker Chambers-IV, Mumbai .. Respondent Mr. Tejveer Singh for the appellant Mr. Jitendra Singh for the respondent P.C. CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & G.S.KULKARNI, J.J. DATED : 5[th] OCTOBER, 2016. 1.This Appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) challenges the order dated 20[th] September, 2013 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal). The impugned order is in respect of Assessment Year 2000-01. 2.The appellant Revenue urges following question of law for our consideration :- (i)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal erred in holding that no disallowance of interest u/s 14A needs to be made even when the assessee has not been able to establish nexus between any available interest free self funds and the investments made in tax free G. Sec. Bonds? 3.It is an agreed position between the parties that the question raised herein is also raised by the Revenue in its appeal being Income Tax Appeal No.1314 of 2013 filed by it in respect of the same respondent assessee from the order of the Tribunal relating to A.Y. 2001-02. This Court by order dated 15[th] April, 2015 did not entertain the aforesaid question also raised in Income Tax Appeal No.1314 of 2013 as the same did not give rise to any substantial question of law. In the above view, the question as raised herein does not give rise to any substantial question of law. Thus, not entertained. 4.The appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs. (G.S. KULKARNI, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan