In Itxa/733/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Vi,Mum` v. M/S Mafatlal Industries Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Decision: In this view of the matter, we dismiss the appeal with liberty to the appellant to move the Tribunal by way of Miscellaneous Application.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
AGK IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
AGK
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.733 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income-tax-VI ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Mafatlal Industries Limited ..Respondent.
Mr.J.S. Saluja for the Appellant.
Ms.V.B. Patel for the Respondent.
CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 14TH OCTOBER, 2008.
P.C. :
1. The only question pressed in this appeal
is regarding the allowance of the market survey
expenses incurred by the assessee in respect of
product titanium diaxode and phtholine anhydrate
project. It is contended that various arguments
advanced by the counsel for the department has not
been considered by the Tribunal. If the tribunal
has failed to consider the argument raised by the
revenue, then the proper course is to move a
miscellaneous application before the tribunal and
not to file an appeal against the order of the
tribunal.
2. In this view of the matter, we dismiss
the appeal with liberty to the appellant to move
the Tribunal by way of Miscellaneous Application.
D.K. DESHMUKH, J.
J.P. DEVADHAR, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.