Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/733/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/733/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Vi,Mum` v. M/S Mafatlal Industries Ltd

High Court 14 Oct 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/733/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Vi,Mum` v. M/S Mafatlal Industries Ltd
Date of order
14 Oct 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itxa/733/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Vi,Mum` v. M/S Mafatlal Industries Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Decision: In this view of the matter, we dismiss the appeal with liberty to the appellant to move the Tribunal by way of Miscellaneous Application.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

AGK IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY AGK ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.733 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income-tax-VI ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Mafatlal Industries Limited ..Respondent. Mr.J.S. Saluja for the Appellant. Ms.V.B. Patel for the Respondent. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 14TH OCTOBER, 2008. P.C. : 1. The only question pressed in this appeal is regarding the allowance of the market survey expenses incurred by the assessee in respect of product titanium diaxode and phtholine anhydrate project. It is contended that various arguments advanced by the counsel for the department has not been considered by the Tribunal. If the tribunal has failed to consider the argument raised by the revenue, then the proper course is to move a miscellaneous application before the tribunal and not to file an appeal against the order of the tribunal. 2. In this view of the matter, we dismiss the appeal with liberty to the appellant to move the Tribunal by way of Miscellaneous Application. D.K. DESHMUKH, J. J.P. DEVADHAR, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan