In Itxa/745/2016 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. Mahalaxmi Infraproject Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 4.Accordingly, both the appeals are dismissed as not pressed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 745 OF 2016WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 746 OF 2016
The Commissioner of Income Tax-I
.. Appellant
v/s. Mahalaxmi Infraproject Pvt. Ltd... Respondent
Mr. N.N. Singh for the appellant
Ms. Alisha Pinto for the respondent
P.C.
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI & M.S. SANKLECHA, J.J.
DATED : 21[st] JANUARY, 2019.
1.These appeals challenge the order passed by the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal.
2.Learned Counsel appearing in support of the appeal invites ourattention to the Circular No.3/2018 dated 11[th] July, 2018 issued by theCentral Board of Direct Taxes which inter alia directs the Revenue notto press the pending appeals where the tax effect is less than Rs.50lakhs.
3.In view of the above Circular, learned Counsel for the Revenuehas been instructed not to press the appeal as the tax effect involved inthe present appeals is less than the threshold limits of Rs.50 lakhs.
4.Accordingly, both the appeals are dismissed as not pressed.
5.Refund of Court Fees as per Rules.
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
(AKIL KURESHI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.