Itxa/747/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, City-21, Mumbai v. Ramesh H. Ashar
High Court
19 Jun 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/747/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, City-21, Mumbai v. Ramesh H. Ashar
Date of order
19 Jun 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/747/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, City-21, Mumbai v. Ramesh H. Ashar, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.747 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax,.City - 21, Mumbai...AppellantV/s.Ramesh H. Ashar...Respondent
Mr.Vimal Gupta, Advocate, for the Appellant.Mr.Rahul K. Hakani, Advocate, i/b. Mr.A.R. Singh,for the Respondent.
P.C. :
CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN &A.V. NIRGUDE, JJ.
.Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellantand the learned Counsel for the Respondent.
2.Both the learned Counsel categorically statethat the question of law raised in the present Appealwas raised in a similar Appeal being Income Tax AppealNo.693 of 2004 before this Court. Being the sameassessee wherein this Court has held in favour of theassessee and against the Revenue, in view of the samewe dismiss the above Appeal.
[A.V. NIRGUDE, J.] [DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue